Verbs 2
Continuing
our look at boas, be/being, the
past tense of the third person singular is fairly simple:
i) Descriptive form:
The
past equivalent of ew it is is o
it was. This is used for descriptions
which were of long duration, rather than events which were completed in the
past. (N.B. There are other ways of saying it
was, which we will deal with later.)
Two
short words can still form a sentence, e.g.:
Teg o. It was lovely.
Wheg o. It was nice.
Hager o.
It was horrible.
Drog o. It was bad.
With
a past participle, o can be used to form the past perfect passive tense, e.g.
Debrys o. It had been
eaten.
Liwys o. It had been
coloured.
If
you start the sentence with O it is a question, e.g.
O teg? Was it
lovely?
O wheg?
Was it nice?
The
verbal particle Th[2] stops
a sentence from being a question, e.g.
Tho teg. It was lovely.
Tho flogh. It was a child.
Tho drog. It was bad.
Replacing
Th
with Nag[3]
gives you a negative sentence, e.g.:
Nag o teg. It was not
lovely.
Nag o flogh. It was not a child.
Nag o diu. It was not
black.
ii) Locative form:
The
past tense equivalent of Ma is Thera[4]. When
used alone, this is the indefinite form.
Again,
a few short words can form a sentence, e.g.
Thera keus. There was
(some) cheese.
Thera mel. There was honey.
By
adding a location we get:
Thera keus war an bord. There was
(some) cheese on the table.
Thera mel e’n pot. There was honey in the pot.
Thera prev et an aval. There was a
worm in the apple.
Thera kei reb tan. There was a dog by a fire.
For
the indefinite interrogative and negative, instead of eus, you still use era.
If the sentence starts with Era it is a question, e.g.
Era keus? Was there (any) cheese?
Era mel? Was there (any) honey?
Era cath reb an tan? Was there a cat by the fire?
And
if a sentence starts with Nag instead of Th it is negative, e.g.
Nag era bara war an
bord. There wasn’t (any) bread
on the table.
Nag era cath reb an
tan. There wasn’t a cat by the fire.
[1] Surely the
shortest sentence ever!
[2] The Middle
Cornish equivalent of <th> is <yth> which is always
written separately, whereas <th> is joined to the verb.
[4] The Middle
Cornish equivalent of <era> is <esa>. Obviously there was a shift
in pronunciation that resulted in a change in spelling. This happened
(independently and much earlier) in English as well, which is why we now have
“he/she/it was” and “they were”. (The [s] was “rhotacised” to [r]. )
[5] Even better
is Nag era mel namoy.
No comments:
Post a Comment